Sunday, 2 September 2012

Jane Lane – The Girl who Saved the English Monarchy by Gillian Bagwell

Jane Lane
While researching The Darling Strumpet, my novel about Nell Gwynn, I read Derek Wilson’s book All the King’s Women, about the numerous women important to Charles II.  As all of us who know anything about Charles II are aware, he liked women.  His mistresses were many and famous, whether loved by the people like Nell Gwynn or hated like Louis De Keroualle.

So I was intrigued to read his account of Jane Lane, an ordinary Staffordshire girl who played a starring role in an extraordinary part of Charles’s life – his six-week odyssey after the Battle of Worcester trying to escape to safety in France.

The Battle of Worcester took place on September 3, 1651.  Charles and his ragged and outnumbered army knew that all their hopes rested on that day, and the 21-year-old king believed that the outcome for him would be “either a crown or a coffin.”  Cromwell triumphed, and the bloody rout ended the Royalist cause.  Once Charles had been convinced that the best he could do was survive, he fled as his supporters made a last ferocious stand, and legendarily dashed out the back door of his lodgings as the enemy entered at the front, slipping out the last unguarded city gate.
Broadsheet 166o

From that disastrous night until he finally sailed from Shoreham near Brighton on October 15, he was on the run, sheltered and aided by dozens of people – mostly simple country folks and very minor gentry.
One of Charles’s companions during his flight from Worcester was the Earl of Derby, who had recently been sheltered at a house called Boscobel in Shropshire.  He suggested that the king might hide there until he could find a way out of England. 

Jane Lane, a young woman of about 25 years old, lived at Bentley Hall in Staffordshire, not far from Boscobel.  She became involved in the king’s flight because she had a pass allowing her and a manservant to travel the hundred miles to visit a friend near Bristol – a major port where the king might board a ship.  In a story that sounds like something out of fiction, the 21-year-old king disguised himself as Jane’s servant, and Jane rode pillion (sitting sidesaddle behind him while he rode astride) along roads traveled by cavalry patrols searching for Charles, through villages where the proclamation describing him and offering a reward for his capture was posted, and among hundreds of people who, if they recognized him, had every reason to turn him in and none – but loyalty to the outlawed monarchy – to help him.

It was an improbable scheme.  Charles was six feet two inches tall and very dark complexioned, not at all common looking for an Englishman of that time.  But time after time he rode right under the noses of Roundhead soldiers without being recognized.  He narrowly eluded discovery and capture so many times that the whole event eventually became known as the Royal Miracle.

Jane Lane played a much more important part in great events than women usually did in those days, especially women who were not monarchs. The fugitive king had been proclaimed a traitor, and anyone who was found to have helped him would be executed for treason.   What Jane did took great bravery, as she was not only risking her life but the lives and lands of her family. 

I was convinced by the evidence Wilson presented that Jane and Charles became lovers when they were in each other’s company, in close physical contact, and in perilous circumstances from September 9 to September 18, 1651.  Jane remained in touch with Charles until he was restored to the throne in 1660.
A Snuff Box given to Jane by Charles II

Then she became famous, and Charles rewarded her richly, awarding her a pension of £1000 pounds a year – quite a lot of money then – as well as giving her a watch that had belonged to his father, paintings of himself, and many other personal mementoes.  He also offered her brother a title and gave her family the right to add the three Lions of England to their coat of arms.

The time that Charles spent on the run was an enormously formative experience, he told the story for the rest of his life, and Jane was clearly someone who he regarded with respect and affection until his death.  He When Jane returned home she married a neighbor, Sir Clement Fisher, who she had likely known before embarking on her adventures with Charles.  But she had no children, and towards the end of her life she declared that her hands would be her executors, i.e., that she would spend all she had.  She did more than that, and because her pension was not being paid on time, she was in debt and died with an estate worth only £10.
A Glove Charles left at Whiteladies

If Charles had been caught, he would certainly have been executed, and it is an open question whether the monarchy would have been restored as it eventually was in 1660, after the death of Oliver Cromwell.  So Jane’s courage had far-reaching results and her story deserves to be remembered. 

Gillian Bagwell’s novel The King’s Mistress, the first fictional accounting of Jane Lane’s adventures with the young King Charles, was released in the U.K. on July 19. (It was published in the U.S. in 2011 as The September Queen). Her first novel, The Darling Strumpet, based on the life of Nell Gwynn, is a finalist for the Romance Writers of America’s RITA award for Best First Book. Her third novel, Venus in Winter, about the formidable four-times widowed Tudor dynast Bess of Hardwick, will be published in the U.S. in July 2013. Please visit Gillian’s website, www.gillianbagwell.com, to read more about her books. Gillian’s blog Jane Lane and the Royal Miracle www.theroyalmiracle.blogspot.com recounts her adventures researching the book and the daily episodes in Charles’s escape after Worcester.



Available under the title 'The September Queen' in the US. 'The King's Mistress' will be released in the UK in July 2012

9 comments:

Wendy said...

Remarkable women like Jane Lane should be discovered and acknowledged. I'm grateful to historical writers like Derek Wilson and Gillian Bagwell and blogsites like Hoydens & Firebrands for presenting her to modern readers. Thank you.

Gillian Bagwell said...

Thanks for hosting me today! So happy to connect once more with Hoydens & Firebrands!

Alison Stuart said...

I have always loved this story. Thank you for bringing it to life, Gillian. I can't wait to read it.

Francine Howarth: UK said...

Hi,

So love this period in history, and have for years read books about this particular era - sense of affinity from having lived in a house of the period I guess and weird dreams.

Pamela Bell was a favourite author of mine who penned English Civil War novels, and even Georgette Heyer wrote Royal Escape - an account of Charles escape from Worcester. Unfortunately she renamed him Charles Stewart as opposed to Charles Stuart.

Charles rewarded all who were good and loyal friends, though I must say I'm a tad sceptical Jane Lane was ever his Mistress as such. A one-night or several-night stand maybe, bearing in mind Charles had a rapacious appetite for sex. Three mistresses at any one time was his form and all were owned up to as his mistresses, yet he never declared Jane Lane a mistress of his. That aside the the novel sounds like a fun read, poet licence in the vein of historical fiction. ;)

Although I write Regency/Georgian romances I recently penned the first novel in what is to be the Royal Series. And no, I haven't sent it to a publisher I self-published it. I walked the route of mainstream publishing successfully for some years, but circumstances beyond my control (riding accident)took me out of the publishing game for a while. When I came back I decided to give Amazon KDP a chance. I've earned more per year than I did via a conventional publisher, so I'm sticking with self-pubbing. I long since gave up on theory to be published by a conventional publisher claims you are a better author than those who choose to go it alone.

best
F

Deborah Swift said...

A great post, that I much enjoyed. £1000 a year seems to be the rate a King paid off all his mistresses. I recently researched Moll Davis, and she got the same! Francine, I haven't come across Pamela Bell, but I'll be checking her out. Gillian , the UK cover is great. I'm a sucker for gold type!

Anonymous said...

Depends on your definition of "mistress". To many people in the past, if an unmarried woman had a sexual relationship with a man that made her his mistress, whether formally acknowledged as such or not.

Kate (Derby, UK)

Gillian Bagwell said...

Thanks, all! Francine, I didn't choose the title 'The King's Mistress' - my U.K. publisher did. The U.S. title was "The September Queen." I don't think Jane was Charles's mistress in the sense of a long-term, being kept relationship. Based on Derek Wilson's book and the evidence he sets forth, I do think they were lovers, at a time when he was a young man on the run and without a throne or many prospects for the future.

I'd love to hear more about your KDP experiences, as soon to be embarking on writing some romance.

Sally Johnson said...

In your research on Charles' women, have you come to any insight on the upper class' attitude to sex and morality? I think of us as being shaped by Victorian sensibilities, but after reading a few books around 14 years of age we adopted whatever philosophy we live by. But these women studied and quoted the Bible at length, and Dante's vision of hell and punishment were real to them. Most were chattles to their male relatives, and had no money or rights or property. Did they read Shakespeare and think, "Juliet and Lady MacBeth are my role models"? Was there an underground 'women's liberation' movement? So many men must have died in the Wars, and families destroyed by the plague, so maybe it was just party time for the survivors? I'd appreciate your insights on their attitudes and upbringing.

Francine Howarth: UK said...

Hi ladies (Gillian),

Oooh, I shall look forward to reading the King's Mistress. Thanks muchly! ;)

best
F